<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Excercise in Critical Thinking</title>
	<link>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/</link>
	<description>Clarke comments on the Restoration Movement and the Church of Christ.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/#comment-52159</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/#comment-52159</guid>
					<description>i still think there's something telling about the fact that for all the passing comments of Christ which speak of the OT's infallibility, inspiration, and authority, the quotes He actually makes largely come from a version (the Septuagint) which was product of both translation and transmission.

if translation and transmission are so harmful to these concepts (infallibility, etc.) as we seem to suspect, why do the NT authors seem so comfortable quoting from texts which were obviously not the original autographs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i still think there&#8217;s something telling about the fact that for all the passing comments of Christ which speak of the OT&#8217;s infallibility, inspiration, and authority, the quotes He actually makes largely come from a version (the Septuagint) which was product of both translation and transmission.</p>
<p>if translation and transmission are so harmful to these concepts (infallibility, etc.) as we seem to suspect, why do the NT authors seem so comfortable quoting from texts which were obviously not the original autographs?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keith Brenton</title>
		<link>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/#comment-52112</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/#comment-52112</guid>
					<description>Don't take it personally.

Since I don't know Greek from elvish, I like Young's Literal Translation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t take it personally.</p>
<p>Since I don&#8217;t know Greek from elvish, I like Young&#8217;s Literal Translation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/#comment-51871</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/a-excercise-in-critical-thinking/#comment-51871</guid>
					<description>Wow... I guess I'm better of writing about obscure topics.  I figured after getting 28 comments about Tripartite Dispensationalism, I'd have a few more comments about biblical inspiration and infalllibility.

-Clarke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; I guess I&#8217;m better of writing about obscure topics.  I figured after getting 28 comments about Tripartite Dispensationalism, I&#8217;d have a few more comments about biblical inspiration and infalllibility.</p>
<p>-Clarke
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
