Comments on: History Presentation http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/ Clarke comments on the Restoration Movement and the Church of Christ. Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:20:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: Clarke http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/#comment-1819 Wed, 31 May 2006 05:41:14 +0000 http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/#comment-1819 Hello: I agree with you Alan. Much of it is more evidence of past division than current. The evangelical community seems to be moving closer and closer together on a lot of issues. If we can get passed the issues that divide us in the Restoration Movement, I think we will have a much better chance of promoting the truths that are obvious to us but aren't obvious enough to the rest of the conservative churches out there such as the importance of baptism and the observance of the Lord's Supper. -Clarke Hello:

I agree with you Alan. Much of it is more evidence of past division than current. The evangelical community seems to be moving closer and closer together on a lot of issues.

If we can get passed the issues that divide us in the Restoration Movement, I think we will have a much better chance of promoting the truths that are obvious to us but aren’t obvious enough to the rest of the conservative churches out there such as the importance of baptism and the observance of the Lord’s Supper.

-Clarke

]]> by: Alan http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/#comment-1813 Wed, 31 May 2006 02:47:24 +0000 http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/#comment-1813 Hi TechSun, I guess you could say the existence of denominations is evidence of division that occurred sometime in the past. My impression is that the heated rhetoric between denominations has cooled substantially compared to 100, 200, or more years ago. I don't think the same thing could be said about the RM. Of course those are just my impressions. Alan Hi TechSun,

I guess you could say the existence of denominations is evidence of division that occurred sometime in the past. My impression is that the heated rhetoric between denominations has cooled substantially compared to 100, 200, or more years ago. I don’t think the same thing could be said about the RM. Of course those are just my impressions.

Alan

]]> by: TechSun http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/#comment-1805 Tue, 30 May 2006 14:01:59 +0000 http://www.clarkecomments.com/archives/history-presentation/#comment-1805 Isn't the existence of denominations divisive? If you have differences, leave and start a denomination, its ok, but if you stay and have differences you contribute to divisiveness? Isn’t the existence of denominations divisive? If you have differences, leave and start a denomination, its ok, but if you stay and have differences you contribute to divisiveness?

]]>